Showing posts with label telemetry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label telemetry. Show all posts

OpenTelemetry Collector vs. Grafana Alloy: Which Should You Choose?

Mike's Notes

Good to know for when I build Mission Control for the Pipi Data Centre later this year.

Resources

References

  • Reference

Repository

  • Home > Ajabbi Research > Library >
  • Home > Handbook > 

Last Updated

28/02/2026

OpenTelemetry Collector vs. Grafana Alloy: Which Should You Choose?

By: Nick Flewitt
Fusion Reactor Blog: 25/02/2026

Nick lives in the UK and is the Marketing Owner at Intergral GmbH - makers of observability software FusionReactor, OpsPilot and OpenTrace.

In the world of modern observability, the “Sorting Office” of your telemetry data is just as important as the data itself. Whether you are shipping traces, metrics, or logs to FusionReactor Cloud, you generally have two main choices: the industry-standard OpenTelemetry Collector or the newcomer Grafana Alloy.

While both tools do the same basic job—receiving, processing, and exporting OTLP data—they cater to very different workflows.

The OpenTelemetry Collector (Contrib)

The “OG” of the space, the OTel Collector is a vendor-agnostic proxy that serves as the central hub of an observability pipeline.

Pros:

  • Industry Standard: It is the default choice for the CNCF ecosystem and has the widest community support.
  • YAML-Based: If your team is comfortable with Kubernetes and standard infrastructure-as-code, the indentation-based YAML configuration will feel like home.
  • Stability: Features such as the memory_limiter ensure the collector remains healthy even during massive data spikes.

Cons:

  • Visibility: Troubleshooting is done primarily through terminal logs. There is no native dashboard to see “where” data is getting stuck.

Grafana Alloy

Grafana Alloy is a “big tent” distribution that natively supports OpenTelemetry, Prometheus, and Loki formats in a single agent.

Pros:

  • The UI Dashboard: Alloy’s standout feature is a local web UI (usually at port 12345) that provides a live, visual flowchart of your pipeline.
  • Flow Configuration: Uses a programmable, component-based language (Alloy Flow) that is modular and easier to scale for complex routing.
  • Unified Agent: It handles Prometheus scraping more natively than the standard OTel collector.

Cons:

  • Learning Curve: You have to learn a new configuration syntax (HCL) rather than staying with standard YAML.

The Verdict: Which is “Best”?


Use Case Recommended Tool Why?
"Set it and Forget it" OTel Collector A standard, reliable pipeline that uses the same YAML format as the rest of your stack.
Complex Data Routing Grafana Alloy Transform data in complex ways or scrape multiple sources (like Prometheus) simultaneously.
High-Visibility Needs Grafana Alloy See exactly how your data is moving (or failing) through a visual UI.

Final Thought

The best part about the modern observability landscape is that both tools use the OTLP standard. This means you can start with the OTel Collector today and switch to Alloy tomorrow (or vice versa) without changing a single line of code in your applications.

As long as you have your FusionReactor API Key ready, your data will find its home in the cloud regardless of which “middleman” you choose.

Automatic enablement of new OpenTelemetry ingestion API

Mike's Notes

Changes on Google Cloud. Important for Pipi using IaC to deploy into GCP.

Pipi Mission Control

Some form of Telemetry will also be needed for the closed Pipi Data Centre. Maybe open-source Grafana Alloy could be used by a home-cooked setup to monitor Pipi, BoxLang, Java, OS, PostgreSQL, etc.

Resources

References

  • OTLP Specification 1.9.0

Repository

  • Home > Ajabbi Research > Library >
  • Home > Handbook > 

Last Updated

15/02/2026

Automatic enablement of new OpenTelemetry ingestion API

By: 
Google Cloud: 13/02/2026

.

We’re writing to let you know that Cloud Observability has launched a new OpenTelemetry (OTel) ingestion API that supports native OpenTelemetry Protocol (OTLP) logs, trace spans, and metrics.

Starting March 23, 2026, this API will be added as a dependency for the current Cloud Logging, Cloud Trace, and Cloud Monitoring ingestion APIs. This change ensures a seamless transition as collection tools migrate to this new unified endpoint.

What you need to know

Key changes:

  • The existing Cloud Observability ingestion APIs (logging.googleapis.com, cloudtrace.googleapis.com, and monitoring.googleapis.com) are automatically activated when you create a Google Cloud project using the Google Cloud console or gcloud CLI. The behavior remains unchanged for projects created via API, which do not have these ingestion APIs enabled by default. Starting March 23, 2026, the new OTel ingestion endpoint telemetry.googleapis.com will automatically activate when any of these specified APIs are enabled.
  • In addition, we will automatically enable this new endpoint for all existing projects that already have current ingestion APIs active.

What you need to do

No action is required from you for this API enablement change, and there will be no disruption to your existing services. You may disable the API at any time by following these instructions.

A day in the life of an OpenTelemetry maintainer

Mike's Notes

Note

Resources

References

  • Reference

Repository

  • Home > Ajabbi Research > Library > Authors > Damien Mathieu
  • Home > Handbook > 

Last Updated

19/11/2025

A day in the life of an OpenTelemetry maintainer

By: Damien Mathieu
OpenTelemetry: 07/10/2025

I am a software engineer with a focus on backend, resilience and observability, currently working at @elastic. Some of the technologies I work with are Go, Ruby, Kubernetes, OpenTelemetry. I am also a contributor to Open-Source. I am writing about software engineering.

When people think about open source, they often picture lines of code, clever algorithms, or maybe a GitHub repository full of issues and pull requests. What can be harder to see is the human side. The people who quietly keep things moving, who make sure contributions land smoothly and help the community grow in a healthy way. That’s the work of a maintainer.

Maintainers are more than just code reviewers. They are the stewards of the SIG’s (Special Interest Group) health, direction, and community. They balance technical oversight with mentorship, governance with collaboration, and long-term vision with the day-to-day realities of issues and pull requests.

I’m Damien, I’m a maintainer of the OpenTelemetry Go SDK, an approver of the OpenTelemetry Collector and a member of several SIGs. In this post, we’ll take a closer look at what it means to be a maintainer: the responsibilities they carry, the challenges they navigate, and the impact they have on both the project and the broader community.

Open Source mentorship

One of the most rewarding parts of being a maintainer is mentorship. Every open source project depends on new contributors stepping in, learning the ropes, and eventually taking on more responsibility themselves. As maintainers, we’re often the first point of contact for someone who’s never contributed to the project before.

Mentorship can look like many different things. Sometimes it’s as simple as leaving a thoughtful code review that doesn’t just point out what’s wrong, but explains why a change matters. Other times, it’s guiding a contributor through their first issue, helping them understand the project’s structure, or showing them how to run tests locally. And every so often, it means stepping back to give someone room to try, even if they don’t get it right the first time.

The goal isn’t just to fix the immediate bug or land the pull request. It’s to help contributors feel confident enough to come back again. A healthy project grows by sharing knowledge, not hoarding it. Mentorship is how maintainers make sure today’s first-time contributor can become tomorrow’s reviewer, and eventually, the next maintainer.

Setting direction and priorities

Another part of being a maintainer is shaping the project’s roadmap. Open source moves fast: there are always new ideas, bug reports, and feature requests. Left unchecked, a project can easily become a grab bag of loosely connected changes. Part of our job as maintainers is to make sure the work stays aligned with the bigger picture.

That means asking questions like:

  • Does this feature fit with our long-term goals?
  • Is now the right time to tackle it?
  • Do we have the capacity to maintain it once it’s merged?

Sometimes the answer is “not yet” or even “no”, and it’s on us to communicate that clearly while still encouraging contributions.

Shaping a roadmap isn’t about dictating every detail. It’s about setting priorities together with the community—listening to feedback, balancing what users need today with where the project should be tomorrow, and making tradeoffs that keep the project sustainable.

The roadmap gives everyone a shared sense of direction. Contributors know where their work fits in, users can see what’s coming next, and the project as a whole stays focused instead of scattered.

Special Interest Group meetings

One of the maintainer’s roles is also to facilitate the frequent meetings that help their SIG communicate and plan its work.

Facilitating a SIG meeting isn’t about running through an agenda like a checklist. It’s about creating space where everyone feels comfortable speaking up, from long-time contributors to someone joining their very first call. That means keeping discussions focused, making sure quieter voices get heard, and helping the group reach consensus without letting debates drag on forever.

There’s also a practical side: preparing the agenda ahead of time, documenting decisions so they’re visible to the wider community, and following up on action items afterward.

In many ways, SIG meetings are where the “community” part of open source really comes to life. As maintainers, our role is to guide the conversation, not control it, making sure the project keeps moving forward while staying open and inclusive.

Challenges

Of course, maintaining isn’t all smooth sailing. One of the hardest parts is balancing the constant flow of contributions with the need to keep the codebase healthy. Every pull request represents someone’s time and effort, and it’s important to honor that. Yet, at the same time, not every change fits the project’s standards or long-term goals. Saying “no” gracefully is just as important as merging a great contribution.

Maintainers also find themselves balancing priorities that go beyond code. Different contributors, and often the companies backing them, come with their own needs and expectations. One team might want a new feature quickly, another might be focused on stability, while the community as a whole still needs clear direction. Managing those competing priorities, and making decisions that serve the project rather than any single interest, is a constant challenge.

Conflicts are another reality. With so many people involved, it’s inevitable that disagreements will happen. Sometimes it’s about technical design, sometimes about process, and occasionally about interpersonal dynamics. Part of the maintainer role is helping to navigate those moments: keeping discussions respectful, finding common ground, and making sure decisions are made transparently.

And yet, despite the difficulties, the impact of this work is enormous: when maintainers succeed, the entire community thrives.

The importance and impact of Open Source maintainers

When maintainers do their job well, the effects ripple far beyond the codebase. A well-tended project feels reliable and welcoming—contributors know their work will be reviewed thoughtfully, users trust the software to be stable, and the community grows because people want to come back.

Good project maintenance builds momentum. A contributor who feels supported on their first pull request is more likely to return for a second. Clear roadmap and consistent standards give people confidence that their effort matters and will fit into the bigger picture. And when conflicts are handled with respect and transparency, it reinforces the culture of trust that makes open source sustainable.

The impact goes deeper than just keeping a project alive. Effective maintainers create the conditions for others to succeed. That’s the real legacy of this role: not just code, but a thriving ecosystem and community built around it.

Conclusion

Being a maintainer is challenging work, but it’s also some of the most meaningful. It’s about more than merging code. It’s about stewardship, mentorship, and creating a community where people feel empowered to contribute. Every healthy open source project owes its success to the care and commitment of its maintainers.

And while the challenges are real, the rewards are just as tangible: the chance to constantly learn, to collaborate on complex problems, and to connect with people from every corner of the world and every kind of background.

OpenTelemetry’s maintainers embody this balance every day, helping the project grow while keeping its community strong.